 |
About
intimacy
Many of us think of intimacy as having sex,
being physically or emotionally close or exchanging deeply
held confidences. But if specific behaviors such as these
produce intimacy, then why don't we experience intimacy
each time we do them? What makes one sexual encounter intimate
and another not? If cultivating closeness is an avenue to
intimacy, why do so many couples who have attained it report
flatness, boredom, loss of vitality or a sense of being
"stuck" rather than feeling passionately alive in each other's
presence? If confiding in another is supposed to bring about
intimacy, why does one communication make us flush to our
roots while another leaves us untouched and unmoved?
|
| |
|
 |
On
gender differences
In our work with hundreds of clients-individuals,
couples and groups-we have found that the intrinsic capacity
for intimacy is the same in women and men, that men are
just as willing and capable as women of moving through their
defenses. Gender conditioning can delay this inclination
in men, but once they recognize this and experience intimacy,
the work of identifying and dissolving their defense structures
is exactly the same as it is for women. We have also found…
|
| |
continue
|
 |
What
is our essential self?
In the work of cultivating intimacy it
is helpful to draw a distinction between our essential self
and our essential nature. In many of the world's spiritual
traditions, the most profound realization, the culmination
of all spiritual quests, involves directly experiencing
our essential nature. Variously referred to as the Absolute,
The Ground Of All Being, our True Nature or our Original
Face, this is the underlying nature of all existence. It
is the impersonal, formless, timeless and changeless aspect
of who we all are. Our essential self is our uniqueness.
Think of a …
|
| |
|
 |
The
role of compassion
As we begin to unmask our negative self-images,
we can feel a great deal of hurt and the fear of being hurt
further. We may also experience self-loathing rising from
the shame and assumed ugliness associated with our initial
inability to absorb this new information. Usually, we contract
around these feelings. We want to ….
|
| |
|
 |
Closeness,
a safe container
There is nothing wrong with using our relationships
to work through issues of dependency. In fact, relationship
may be the best place to work through them. What we are
concerned with here is not that we are dependent but the
level and duration of the dependency. The ability to move
beyond an "other-focus" requires…
|
| |
|
 |
Agreements:
How they can prolong closeness and prevent intimacy
A partnership rooted in the healthy closeness
stage values equality; the couple places an emphasis on
creating and maintaining a foundation of "shared-power"
as opposed to "power-over." Since we choose to take someone
else's desires into account, we negotiate instead of simply
taking or being taken from. This ability and desire to compromise,
however, can lead to more sophisticated approaches to maintaining
our defense structure. Surprisingly enough…
|
| |
|
 |
Dissolving
our defenses
If we are to realize our potential to
know ourselves as whole and loving, to express the open,
present beings we are, and to love ourselves and others
from the undefended core of our being, we must turn and
face all the places where we are stuck, wounded, withholding
and contracted. We must…
|
| |
continue
|
 |
Intimate
allies
Exposing ourselves to what we expect will
be emotional annihilation is not easy. It means staying
with an issue in the presence of our partners when continuing
is the hardest thing to do. It means stretching to stay
open even if shutting down is our main line of defense.
It means …
|
| |
continue
|
|